primatoscopia-01
ponerse a prueba entre animales
acerca de esta contribución
I lead an art-research project at the crossroads of art and North American anthropology, where clay, a medium for creative practices, also becomes an object of knowledge. This material can be used to foster questions and considerations about our perceptual frameworks, our ways of learning, our sensory knowledge, and our relationships with other living beings, as in the research presented here, with macaques.
The art-research project Primatoscopy-01 is subdivided into four distinct phases, which began with the search for comparative elements between related perceptual environments. The experiments begin with a system in which blocks of clay are scattered in enclosures at equal distances from each other and far from any equipment used in captivity conditions. This arrangement aims to delimit certain characteristics of nonhuman primates (physical strength, hierarchization, grasping, movement, etc.), but also to maximize the relationship between individuals and clay.
The initial phase, although decisive, proved disappointing, leading to a complete realignment of my expectations: Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) carry the herpes B virus (Herpesvirus simiae), which hinders access to artifacts after they’ve been handled. The virus has become a constraint of the experimental protocol, as it limits my involvement in the enclosures after each phase, requires the use of Virkon® clay (a virucide, bactericide, and fungicide), and forces me to isolate the artifacts until their firing. As an archaeologist, I methodically recorded the state of the enclosures and attempted to reconstruct the activities based on the material traces, seeking to make sense of these behavioral artifacts. The results looked disastrous straight away: clay was scattered among the food and excrement; there were few marks in the clay and the blocks had hardly been handled. The primates seemed disturbed by these physical “intrusions” in their enclosure.
The later phases (2 to 4) were characterized by a diversification of stimuli by introducing more “enticing” clay forms in the enclosures. The use of traditional forms, mainly Edo– and Heian-influenced vases and teabowls, as food containers, was particularly effective in tempting the macaques to handle them. A more significant understanding of behavioral patterns only emerged at the end of phase 2, revealing a separation of primate activities according to the functional divisions of their enclosures: captive macaques do not play where they eat.
Analysis of the evidence has revealed a recurring pattern: the primates tended to break up the clay once it was dry, using its materiality to draw lines on the ground. The multitude of tangled lines was astonishing, because they were constant and repetitive. It seemed to be the main interest suggested to them by the clay’s malleability. I have divided the lines into two categories: the lines of transportation (linear, simple, and intermittent) and the lines of persistence (localized, superimposed, and demonstrating a back-and-forth movement).
The persistence lines are compared with nesting diagrams drawn by primatologists, evoking links between cognition, environment, and cultural construction. These relationships are first evident through the fusiform gyrus, a cerebral structure shared by all primates, which ensures the recognition of the contours of the environment and faces, while opening the way to alternative analogies with ancient writing systems. These reveal the continuity between the macrocosm in which we evolve and the microcosm of our inner representations, accepting our animal condition as well as the role of the imagination in the performativity of human worlds and their impact on all living things.
créditos
autor: Yanik Potvin, Universidad de Quebec en Chicoutimi, Universidad de Quebec en Montreal
diseño gráfico: Fabien Gagnon
fotos: Patrick Moisan y Yanik Potvin
apoyo financiero: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Louis-Claude Paquin, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.
agradecimientos: Louis-Claude Paquin, Dominic Papillon, Centre Bang, Patrick Moisan, Arnaud Tremblay, Fabien Gagnon, Manek Kolhatkar, Paul Kawzcak, Hélène Doyon, Sylvie Genest, Doug Bailey, .able journal, Samuel Bianchini, Gwenaëlle Lallemand, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), Conseil des arts et lettres du Québec (CALQ), université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC).
referencias y derechos
referencias y derechos de imagen
leer más leer menos
imágenes reproducidas con autorización por Patrick Moisan y Yanik Potvin
Kohsei Izawa, Schematic Representation of Six Chimpanzee Nests, 1966: https://implosion.architexturez.net/00AA2_Apes_NestsFig_Lg01.html. Todos los derechos reservados.
Wu Weimin, William W Newcomb, Naiqian Cheng, Anastasia Aksyuk, Dennis C. Winkler, Steven C. Alasdair, 3D reconstruction of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), based on EM map (Internal Proteins of the Procapsid and Mature Capsids of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Mapped by Bubblegram Imaging) EM DATA BANK (EMDB) ID: 3288, 2016: https://pdbj.org/emnavi/quick.php?id=emdb-3288. Dominio público.
bibliografía y referencias
leer más leer menos
LIBROS
Adamson, Glenn. 2018. Thinking Through Craft. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Vol. 1–2. Nueva York: Ballantine Books.
Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. 1.ª ed. Nueva York: Dutton.
Bateson, Gregory. 1991. A Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Nueva York: Cornelia & Michael Bessie Book.
Borgdorff, Henk. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Braidotti, Rosi, y Simone Bignall. 2018. Posthuman Ecologies: Complexity and Process after Deleuze. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield.
Braidotti, Rosie. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chapais, Bernard. 2015. Liens de sang : aux origines biologiques de la société humaine. Montreal: Boréal.
Cheney, Dorothy L., y Robert M. Seyfarth. 2018. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coles, Alex. 2012. The Transdisciplinary Studio. Vol. 1. Berlín: Sternberg Press.
Currie, Gregory. 2004. Arts and Minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dobrin, Sidney I. 2015. Writing Posthumanism, Posthuman Writing. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real: Art and Theory at the End of the Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Londres: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Londres: Free Association.
Haraway, Donna J. 2013. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. 2007. I Am a Strange Loop. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Hutchins, Edwin. 1996. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ingold, Tim. 1994. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Londres: Routledge.
Ingold, Tim. 2015. The Life of Lines. Nueva York: Routledge.
Ingold, Tim. 2021. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Londres: Routledge.
Ingold, Tim. 2022. Imagining for Real: Essays on Creation, Attention and Correspondence. Londres: Routledge.
Kodalak, Gökhan. 2024. «Gregory Bateson, Distributed Mind, and Cybernetic Ecology». En The Space of Technicity: Theorising Social, Technical and Environmental Entanglements, pp. 95–117. Delft: TU Delft OPEN Books.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka. 2015. Reconceptualizing Qualitative Research: Methodologies without Methodology. Londres: SAGE Publications.
Laine, Anna. 2018. Practicing Art and Anthropology: A Transdisciplinary Journey. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Londres: Psychology Press.
Lemoigne, Jean-Louis. 2021. Les Épistémologies constructivistes. París: Presses universitaires de France.
Malafouris, Lambros. 2016. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manning, Erin, y Brian Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marcus, George E., y Michael M. J. Fischer. 1999. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Michaels, Anne. 2010. The Winter Vault. Nueva York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Nannini, Alessandro. 2021. «Aesthetica Experimentalis: Baumgarten and the Aesthetic Dimension of Experience». En The Experiential Turn in Eighteenth-Century German Philosophy, pp. 55–77. Londres: Routledge.
Paré, Zaven. 2021. Le Spectacle anthropomorphique : entre les singes et les robots. Dijon: Les presses du réel.
Petzinger, Genevieve von. 2017. The First Signs: Unlocking the Mysteries of the World’s Oldest Symbols. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2017. Systèmes expérimentaux et choses épistémiques. París: Classiques Garnier.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2018. «Epistemics and Aesthetics of Experimentation: Towards a Hybrid Heuristics?». En Practicing Art/Science, 236–249. Londres: Routledge.
Sansi, Roger. 2015. Art, Anthropology and the Gift. Nueva York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Schneider, Arnd, y Christopher Wright. 2013. Anthropology and Art Practice. Londres: Routledge.
Schwab, Michael. 2013. Experimental Systems: Future Knowledge in Artistic Research. Louvain: Leuven University Press.
Staubach, Suzanne. 2013. Clay: The History and Evolution of Humankind’s Relationship with Earth’s Most Primal Element. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Uexküll, Jakob von. 2013. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Waal, Frans de. 2001. Quand les singes prennent le thé : de la culture animale. París: Fayard.
ARTÍCULOS DE REVISTA
Barad, Karen. 2003. «Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter». Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
Borofsky, Robert. 2002. «The Four Subfields: Anthropologists as Mythmakers». American Anthropologist 104 (2): 403–80.
Chick, Victoria y Sheila Dow. 2005. «The Meaning of Open Systems». Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (3): 363–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780500223585.
Cozzolino, Francesca y Thomas Golsenne. 2019. «Pour une anthropologie de la création». Images Re-vues. Histoire, anthropologie et théorie de l’art (número especial 7).
Fagot, Joël, Louis-Jean Boë, Frédéric Berthommier, Nicolas Claidière, Raphaëlle Malassis, Adrien Méguérditchian, Arnaud Rey y Marie Montant. 2018. «The Baboon: A Model for the Study of Language Evolution». Journal of Human Evolution 126: 39–50.
Féral, Josette. 2013. «De la performance à la performativité». Communications 92 (1): 205–18. https://doi.org/10.3917/commu.092.0205.
Friedman, Ken. 2007. «Behavioral Artifacts: What Is an Artifact? Or Who Does It?» Artifact: Journal of Virtual Design – Artifact 1: 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600610764.
Genest, Sylvie. 2017. «Constructivismes en études ethniques au Québec : retour à la notion de frontières de Barth». Anthropologie et Sociétés 41 (3):59–85. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043042ar.
Graeber, David. 2013. «It Is Value That Brings Universes into Being». HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 219–43. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.012.
Hicks, Dan. 2013. «Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford». Current Anthropology 54 (6): 753–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/673385.
Ingold, Tim. 2012. «Culture, nature et environnement». Traducción de Pierre Madelin. Tracés. Revue de sciences humaines, n.o 22 (junio): 169–87. https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.5470.
Ingold, Tim. 2014. «That’s Enough about Ethnography!» HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 383–95. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021.
Ingold, Tim. 2019. «Art and Anthropology for a Sustainable World». Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 25 (4): 659–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13125.
Kano, Fumihiro y Masaki Tomonaga. 2010. «Face Scanning in Chimpanzees and Humans: Continuity and Discontinuity». Animal Behaviour 79 (1): 227–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.003.
Kohsei, Izawa. 1966. «Chimpanzees in Kasakati Basin, Tanganyika: Ecological Study in the Rainy Season 1963-1964». Kyoto University African Studies 1: 73–156.
Langlitz, Nicolas y Shirley C. Strum. 2017. «Baboons and the Origins of Actor-Network Theory». BioSocieties 12 (1): 158–67. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-016-0035-y.
Lehmann, Ann-Sophie. 2012. «Showing Making: On Visual Documentation and Creative Practice». The Journal of Modern Craft 5. https://doi.org/10.2752/174967812X13287914145398.
Malafouris, Lambros. 2019. «Mind and Material Engagement». Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7.
March, Paul Louis. 2019. «Playing with Clay and the Uncertainty of Agency. A Material Engagement Theory Perspective». Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (1): 133–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9552-9.
Nimkulrat, Nithikul. 2013. «Situating Creative Artifacts in Art and Design Research». FORMakademisk 6. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.657.
Palmer, Hugh. 2022. «“Think Different” to Prevent Extinction. Connecting Gregory Bateson’s Cybernetic Epistemology with Posthumanism». Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice 5 (2): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.28963/5.2.3.
Potvin, Yanik. 2024. «Creative Anthropology as a Unit for Knowing: Epistemic Object and Experimental System in Research-Creation “in” Clay». Humans 4 (1): 108–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/humans4010007.
Premack, David y Guy Woodruff. 1978. «Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?» Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4): 515–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512.
Ruys, J. D., S. P. Mendoza, J. P. Capitanio y W. A. Mason. 2004. «Behavioral and Physiological Adaptation to Repeated Chair Restraint in Rhesus Macaques». Physiology & Behavior 82 (2): 205–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.031.
Verdon, Michel. 2007. «Franz Boas : Cultural History for the Present, or Obsolete Natural History?» Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13 (2): 433–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00435.x.
Whitfield, Stephen J. 2010. «Franz Boas : The Anthropologist as Public Intellectual». Society 47 (5): 430–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9355-x.
CATÁLOGO DE EXHIBICIÓN
Potvin, Yanik, Paul Kawczak y Manek Kolhatkar. 2023. Artefacts comportementaux/Behavioural Artifacts. Alma: Édition OQP/Sagamie
para citar este artículo
Este artículo utiliza el estilo Chicago para sus referencias
Potvin, Yanik. 2025. «Primatoscopia-01: ponerse a prueba entre animales». Revista .able:
citar este artículo
MLA
ES
Potvin, Yanik. «Primatoscopia-01: ponerse a prueba entre animales». Revista .able, 2025.
ISO 690
ES
POTVIN, Yanik. «Primatoscopia-01: ponerse a prueba entre animales». Revista .able [en línea]. 2025. Disponible en:
imprima esta contribución
Use los enlaces a continuación para imprimir esta contribución. Puede escoger entre un formato de alta calidad o un formato de calidad ecológica, optimizado para reducir su impacto ambiental.