this is a zoom.able
zoom and drag and drop to navigate in this project

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
%
symbiotic wood • .able Journal
preiew print
close info

symbiotic wood

Pelin Asa, Judith Marlen Dobler, Peter Fratzl, Jessica Farmer, Johannes A. J. Huber, Florent Jouy, Nuri Kang, Rahel Kesselring, Anna Kubelík, Karin Krauthausen, Inka Mai, Sakiko Noda, Stefan Neuhäuser, Julia Rhein, Robert Stock, Kerstin Wolff & Karola Dierichs - June 27, 2025

the original language of this article is english

tags :

layout format :

about this contribution

Symbiotic Wood is an exploration on diversity and non-predictability. As humans share the natural world with others (living and nonliving entities), coexisting with forests and understanding wood means more than merely living with a useful material (Lemke 2019, Jaque 2021). Here, we consider spruce as a crucial example, shared between bark beetles and humans, among others.

Currently, climate change in combination with monocultures is causing increasingly greater areas of forests to be affected by insects and fungi (Statistisches Bundesamt 2022, Bentz et al. 2022). The harvested material from these areas is often devalued economically. Spruce forests are particularly susceptible in this respect, as they are not able to adapt to drought-stricken soil with their shallow roots (Puhe 2003, Netherer et al. 2014) and due to monoculture, insects can find hosts easily and spread quickly (Hlásny et al. 2019). Forests that include large areas infected with bark beetles are cleared prematurely to prevent the insects spreading further but the felled trees are often left on the forest floor or outside subject to the weather conditions because the amount may be larger than anticipated, and thus difficult to transport, store, or process (Hömberg and Kubelik 2023). During this time, they might be further populated by other organisms or rot fungi, often detectable through surface damage and discoloration. Almost all the affected material processed by local sawmills is currently sold as highly devalued timber. The material is mostly burned for energy extraction or sourced for packaging. Although stains from beetle and fungal infestation are only aesthetic and do not change the wood’s properties if detected and stopped early (Clay et al. 2024, Hýsek et al. 2021), the affected material is not preferred for sale.

Spruce monocultures were originally planned to make wood that would be fully predictable in its availability and properties for human use. As a nonhuman agency with massive impact, bark beetles render the predictability of timber harvesting almost impossible, creating economical and logistical problems. There is, however, something to learn from this: in our damaged environments, it will be necessary to find new modes of planting, processing, and harvesting. Learning how to use infested wood will hopefully encourage human communities to embrace non-predictability in designing wood products based on what is available. Thus, the current flourishing of bark beetles is confronting us with the need to envisage situated design concepts for coping with the diversity and lack of predictability caused by contamination.

Symbiotic Wood instigates a revaluing of wood as a material that we co-use with other species, a material that might be different from our expectations, thus inviting new forms of design for “multispecies worlds” (Tsing 2015). Our interdisciplinary team—material science, cultural history, art and computational design and construction— investigates this condition through a series of epistemic images, unfolding symbiosis through three spatially articulated layers: matter, cognition, and creation:

Layer 1: Matter. Spruce wood is introduced in its ecosystem, a forest in Feldbuch, Franconia, Germany. The stem shows the so-called “galleries” of the bark beetle (Ips typographus) and the blue stain the beetle typically induces in the stem.

Layer 2: Cognition. A layer presenting fundamental knowledge from material science and cultural history about beetle- and fungi-affected wood. It includes results from image-based analysis methods conducted at the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces as well as historical documents on bark beetles that laid the foundations for applied forest entomology. These are complemented by contemporary art works on artistic practices related to places, habitats, and ecosystems by Rahel Kesselring, as well as transience in plant-worlds by Nuri Kang with Karin Krauthausen.

Layer 3: Creation. This layer features elements from both artistic- and design-based approaches to beetle- and fungi-affected wood. Wood Kinship is a design ethnography (Dobler 2025) following the early traces of an infested spruce forest. It features prints made from the beetle galleries by Anna Kubelik. Design studies on architectural material systems that investigate how the material anisotropy and perceived weakness of beetle- and fungi-affected wood can be used to build a spatial structure that fulfills different architectural performance criteria.

credits

authors:

Pelin Asa,1,7 Judith Dobler,5,7 Peter Fratzl,1,7 Jessica Farmer,7 Johannes A. J. Huber,3 Florent Jouy,6 Nuri Kang,5,7 Rahel Kesselring,2,7 Anna Kubelík,7 Karin Krauthausen,7 Inka Mai,4,7 Sakiko Noda,4 Stefan Neu-häuser,4 Julia Rhein,1,5 Robert Stock,2,7 Kerstin Wolff,4,7 Karola Dierichs1,5,7

1 Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (MPICI)

2 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU)

3 Luleå University of Technology (LTU)

4 Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)

5 Weißensee School of Art and Design Berlin (KHB)

6 Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development (HNEE)

7 Cluster of Excellence Matters of Activity (MoA)

photo credits: see iconography and references below

acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the support of the Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity. Image Space Material« (MoA), funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC 2025—390648296.

references and rights

illustration copyrights

read more read less

photos reproduced with permission:

Pelin Asa, Bark Beetle Galleries on a Spruce Tree. Photo © Pelin Asa, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces.

Pelin Asa, Bark and Blue-Stained Wood from a Beetle-Infested Spruce Tree. Photo © Pelin Asa, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces.

Pelin Asa, Topologically Interlocking Units from Beetle-Infested Spruce Wood. Photo © Pelin Asa, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces.

Pelin Asa, Topologically Interlocking Units from Beetle-Infested Spruce Wood. Photo © Pelin Asa, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces.

Karola Dierichs, Offcuts from Beetle-Infested Spruce Trees. Blue-Stain in Offcuts from Beetle-Infested Spruce Trees. Photo © Karola Dierichs, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Weißensee School of Art and Design Berlin, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces.

Judith Marlen Dobler, Wood Kinship—Fieldwork in the Black Forest. Photo © Judith Marlen Dobler, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Weißensee School of Art and Design Berlin.

Nuri Kang, Fragmentary Time. Photo © Nuri Kang, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«, Weißensee School of Art and Design Berlin.

Rahel Kesselring, How to Hold Things. Photo © Rahel Kesselring, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«.

Anna Kubelík, Wood Print on Paper with Beetle-Infested Wood. Photo © Anna Kubelík, Cluster of Excellence »Matters of Activity«.

Julius Theodor Christian Ratzeburg, Die Forst-Insecten oder Abbildung und Beschreibung der in den Wäldern Preußens und der Nachbarstaaten als schädlich oder nützlich bekannt gewordenen Insecten: in systematischer Folge und mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Vertilgung der Schädlichen. Berlin: Nicolai, 1839, Tafel XII, Tafel XV. Photo © Digitalisat der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin.

Julia Rhein, A Collection of Veneers from Bark Beetle Wood. Photo © Julia Rhein

bibliography and references

read more read less

Bentz, Barbara, E. Matthew Hansen, Marianne Davenport, and David Soderberg. 2022. “Complexities in Predicting Mountain Pine Beetle and Spruce Beetle Response to Climate Change.” In Bark Beetle Management, Ecology, and Climate Change, edited by Kamal Gandhi and Richard Hofstetter, pp. 31–54. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822145-7.00013-1

Clay, Natalie A., J. D.Tang, C. M. Siegert, J. T. Thomason, N. Benedetto, D. Day, K. Pace, O. Leverón, R. W. Hofstetter, and J. J. Riggins. 2024. “Decomposition of Bark Beetle-Attacked Trees after Mortality Varies Across Forests.” Forest Ecology and Management 553: 121636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121636.

Dobler, Judith Marlen. 2025. Wood Kinship—Round Table at the Symbiotic Wood Exhibition, More-than-Human Series. Berlin: Kunstgewerbemuseum.

Hlásny, Tomáš, Paal Krokene, Andrew Liebhold, Claire Montagné-Huck, Jörg Müller, Hua Qin, Kenneth Raffa, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Rupert Seidl, Miroslav Svoboda, and Heli Viiri. 2019. Living with Bark Beetles: Impacts, Outlook and Management Options. From Science to Policy 8. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute. https://doi.org/10.36333/fs08

Hömberg, Florian, and Gisela Kubelík. 2023. Interview with the Forester and Forest Owners, Feldbuch.

Hýsek, Štěpán, Radim Löwe, and Marek Turčáni. 2021. “What Happens to Wood after a Tree Is Attacked by a Bark Beetle?” Forests 12 (9): 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091163

Jaque, Andrés, Marina Otero Verzier, and Lucia Pietroiusti, eds. 2021. More-than-Human. Madrid: Office for Political Innovation.

Lemke, Thomas. 2019. “‘More than Human’: Konturen eines posthumanistischen Konzepts der Biopolitik.” In Komplexe Dynamiken globaler und lokaler Entwicklungen. Verhandlungen des 39. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Göttingen 2018. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Netherer, Sigrid, Bradley Matthews, Klaus Katzensteiner, Elizabeth Blackwell, Peter Henschke, Peter Hietz, Johann Pennerstorfer, Stefan Rosner, Shigeru Kikuta, Harald Schume, and Axel Schopf. 2015. “Do Water-Limiting Conditions Predispose Norway Spruce to Bark Beetle Attack?” New Phytologist 205 (3): pp. 1128–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13166

Puhe, Jürgen. 2003. “Growth and Development of the Root System of Norway Spruce (Picea abies) in Forest Stands—A Review.” Forest Ecology and Management 175 (1–3): 253–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00134-2.

Ratzeburg, Julius Theodor Christian. 1837. Die Forst-Insecten oder Abbildung und Beschreibung der in den Wäldern Preussens und der Nachbarstaaten als schädlich oder nützlich bekannt gewordenen Insecten: In systematischer Folge und mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Vertilgung der Schädlichen. Erster Theil: Die Käfer. Berlin: Nicolai.

Ratzeburg, Julius Theodor Christian. 1841. Die Waldverderber und ihre Feinde oder Beschreibung und Abbildung der schädlichsten Forstinsecten und der übrigen schädlichen Waldthiere. Berlin: Nicolai.

Statistisches Bundesamt. 2023. “Amount of Damaged Timber Logged Dropped to 44.7 Million Cubic Metres in 2022.” https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Economic-Sectors-Enterprises/Agriculture-Forestry-Fisheries/Forestry-Wood/forestry-wood.html.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press

to cite this article

This article is using Chicago format for its references

Asa, Pelin et al. 2025. “Symbiotic Wood.” .able journal: https://doi.org/10.69564/able.en.25027.symbioticwood

discover on social media

Coming soon

discover other articles

- +
read more